A- de 2021
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
✓Claimant Jose Ivan Matallana Eslava
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
La demanda se rechazó porque en el escrito de subsanación persistieron los reparos evidenciados en el auto de inadmisión.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR el recurso impetrado, luego de verificar que el recurrente solo pretendía con el mismo abrir la posibilidad de discutir las razones que motivaron la inadmisión.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR el recurso de suplica presentado por el ciudadano Jose Ivan Matallana Eslava contra el auto proferido el 20 de septiembre de 2021, por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad en el expediente D-14.382.
- SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.